6502 Opcode 8B (XAA, ANE)

From VisualChips

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Tested CPUs)
(Resources: link to a couple of forum threads)
Line 398: Line 398:
* For a list of all opcodes and some explanation of what they do, see [[6502 all 256 Opcodes]].
* For a list of all opcodes and some explanation of what they do, see [[6502 all 256 Opcodes]].
* For notes on other opcodes we've explored in our simulations, see [[6502_Unsupported_Opcodes|here]].
* For notes on other opcodes we've explored in our simulations, see [[6502_Unsupported_Opcodes|here]].
* 2004 [http://plus4world.powweb.com/forum.php?postid=6775 forum thread] on plus/4 world
* 2006 [http://noname.c64.org/csdb/forums/?roomid=11&topicid=30951&showallposts=1 forum thread] on CSDb

Revision as of 21:52, 12 February 2011

Of all the unsupported opcodes, 8B has had a lot of attention because it seems unpredictable. Even the same computer has been seen to act differently even with the same inputs.



The reason is that this opcode connects the A register to SB (the Special Bus) at both input and output: in a sense, A is both read and written. Unlike the stack pointer, the A register is not designed to do that, and the result is a circuit configuration which behaves in an interesting way.

Note that our switch-level simulation tends to produce wired-AND behaviour: if two logic gates both drive the same wire, then either of them can drive it low. A real 6502 usually does the same, which is why 8B - often called XAA - will more or less AND together the three inputs: the X register, the A register, and the immediate operand.

Why more or less? Two reasons: the A register is fed back on itself, and because of an interaction with the RDY input.

The A register drives the SB directly, and bits 0 and 4 read SB directly. The other 6 bits read SB through the Decimal Adjust logic, which doesn't affect the logic value but does affect the timing, the logic thresholds and the drive strengths. Exactly what happens is an analogue problem, not a digital one, so it will depend on the exact model of CPU, the variations of chip manufacture, the power supply and the temperature. We can't even model this without knowing the transistor strengths and having some idea of the transistor parameters - which we can only guess at.

The RDY input is a more digital influence on the outcome. RDY is intended to stall the CPU during read accesses, so it can read from slow memory. As it happens, the 6502 samples the databus on every falling clock edge, and loads the IDL (Input Data Latch), and then drives into the target register. Normally, the final cycle is the one which counts, overwriting the stray external values. In some computers, RDY is used to stall the CPU while the bus is used for DMA, which means the bus contains data such as video data for several cycles, except the last. In the case of XAA, every cycle's data is ANDed into A, and this is why the final value of A changes even for the same values of operand, X and A.

Circuit Diagram

Here's an abridged circuit diagram. Note that bits 0 and 4 have direct A feedback whereas the other bits have indirect feedback. Note that phi1 is when A is written, but the preceding phi2 is when the operand is loaded and the two busses precharged high.


(Logic gate pullups shown as resistors, although in NMOS logic pullups are not usually depletion-mode transistors. They pull up to the positive rail. The pass transistors and precharges cannot pull up to the rail: they drop a threshold voltage. These considerations will affect an analogue analysis.)

Testing this opcode

This opcode has 3 bytes of input, supposing that we're not allowing RDY to stall the machine and add more operands. We have a test program which tests 256^3 combinations of inputs and compares the final A and the two affected flags against a model. We also have a few specific combinations we've used to characterise different chips.

  • describe or define the programs here
  • also mention the Java simulation which tests the robustness of the switch simulator results (against the order of evaluation)

Modelling this opcode

Mention and link to an emulator code fragment.

The base formula for XAA seens to be:

A = (A | magic) & X & imm

"magic" defines which bits of A shine through.

Tested CPUs

We collect here some results of testing this opcode on various CPUs from different manufacturers and in various computers.

manufacturer type YYWW country markings on back device tested in tester magic RDY clears #4 stable* N,Z flags OK** notes
MOS 6502 7551 USA? MOS
MCS 6502
 ? KIM-1 Michael FF  ?  ?  ? only minimal testing done
MOS 6502 8402 Philippines MOS
CBM1541 Michael EE  ? yes  ? this is the chip that came with this disk drive
MOS 6502B 8207 Korea MOS
5231 07
CBM1541 Michael EE  ? yes  ? from my Atari 800
Rockwell 6502 8228 Mexico R6502P
CBM1541 Michael FF  ? yes  ? Simon's; spare part bought from retailer
MOS 6510 8337  ? MOS
 ? C64
Michael FF no yes  ?
MOS 6510 8431 Hong Kong MOS
Michael FF no yes  ?
MOS 8500 8551  ? MOS
 ? C64
Michael FE yes yes  ? very early 8500
MOS 8500 9009 Hong Kong CSG
0990 24
Michael FE yes yes  ? very late 6502-like CPU
MOS 6502AD 8521  ? MOS
 ? CBM1541 Michael FF  ? no  ? bit #3 of X input gets treated as "bit #3 of X & bit #4 of X" most of the time (depends on A though)
very unstable
1 MHz mode tested, can also do 2 MHz; chip is from a VC1571
Pravetz CM630P 8744 Hungary (symbol)
(none) CBM1541 Michael FE  ? no yes bit #4 anomalies
Synertek 6502  ????  ? SY
 ? CBM1541 Michael  ? Simon's; yet to test
MOS 8502  ????  ? MOS
 ? C128D Michael  ? yet to test; can do 1 MHz and 2 MHz
MOS 6502  ????  ? MOS
 ? VC1581 Michael  ? yet to test; can do 1 MHz and 2 MHz
Synertek SALLY 8323  ? C014806-03
 ? Atari 800XL Hias 00 - yes yes
Synertek SALLY 8320  ? C014806-03
 ? Atari 800XL Hias 00 - almost  ? 40 errors in 256^3 full test
sometimes bit 3 was set
Synertek SALLY 8408  ? C014806-03
 ? Atari 800XL Hias 00 - no yes ~150k - 450k errors (1% - 2.7%) in full test
sometimes bit 3 set, for example A=03 X=FF imm=FF results either in 03 or 0B in repeated tests
Rockwell SALLY 8322  ? C014806-12
 ? Atari 800XL Hias 00 - no almost ~30k - 80k errors (0.2% - 0.5%) in full test
sometimes bit 3 is set, but also bit 2 and 5 were set sometimes
for example A=5F or A=87 resulted in a set bit 3 (quite frequently), bit 5 (less frequently) or bit 2 (least frequent)
only flipping from 0 to 1 observed, no flipping from 1 to 0
flags were wrong 115 times (~7ppm)
NCR SALLY 8737  ? NCR C014806C-29
F826948 S8737
 ? Atari 800XE Hias 00 - yes  ?
 ? SALLY  ?  ? C014806-35
(C) ATARI 1980
 ? Atari 65XE Hias 00 - no no This one is highly unstable and the formula seems to be more like A & X & (imm | 6E)
when the CPU is cold A=FF X=FF imm=00 result in 46, later 66 and then 6E (when the CPU is warm)
bit 0 often flips from 0 to 1, for example A=01 X=01 imm=0C results in 00 or 01 (01 occurring more frequently when the CPU is warm)
Also bit 3 flipping from 1 to 0 was observed with A=09 X=E5 and imm=05 or 41 (result: 00 instead of 08)
also the Z flag is often incorrectly set to 1 when the result is non-zero. N flag seems to be OK.
Rockwell SALLY 8328  ? C014806-12
0579 8328
 ? Atari 130XE Hias 00 - yes  ?
Synertek SALLY 8324  ? C014806-03
 ? Atari 600XL Hias 00 - yes  ?
Synertek SALLY 8321  ? C014806-03
 ? Atari 600XL Hias 00 - no  ? ~95k errors (0.6%) in full test, sometimes bit 3 was set
Synertek SALLY 8407  ? C014806-03
 ? Atari 800XL Hias 00 - yes  ?
Rockwell  ? 8402 Mexico? R6502AP
 ? BBC Model B EdS  ?  ?  ?  ?  ?

(*)Note: "stable" means that the formula, the "magic" value and the potential #4 clearing by RDY fully describe the behavior.
(**)Note: N and Z flags are set according to the result of XAA


Personal tools